Bruce Willis Should Have Had a Better Career

Do you remember the rakish, charming scoundrel from Moonlighting? Or the scruffy, world-weary, reluctant hero from Die Hard? What happened to those guys?

I miss those guys. Especially when I see what we have now: a generic washed up action star. Where did it all go wrong for Bruce Willis?

I’m never going to see The Expendables 2. I’m just not. I feel no nostalgia for Jean Claude Van Damme movies, and I get no kicks from seeing the aging Schwazeneggers and Stallones prancing around cracking canned one-liners while they shoot machine guns.

Bruce Willis’s participation in said The Expendables 2 fills me with sadness.

He didn’t have to come become a generic action movie guy. His filmography didn’t have to be filled with turkeys like Armageddon, Striking Distance, and a whole lot of terrible sequels.

Every now and then, when Willis gets a chance to show his stuff, we see glimpses of the actor he used to be and could have been. He shows range, thoughtfulness and charm. And then he goes and cashes another five paychecks to make another five horrible films.

Each of these moments offers Willis a shot at redemption and a chance to redefine himself — but he’s wasted each opportunity. After Pulp Fiction, both Willis and John Travolta had a chance to move into fascinating new phases of their careers and both blew it equally badly. Willis followed Fiction with the all-time-terrible North and the dreadful Color of Night.

The interesting movies that dot his resume since then — Nobody’s Fool, The Fifth Element, Sin City, Moonrise Kingdom — get drowned out by the ocean of dreck. And looking into Willis’s future, here’s what’s on tap: another Die Hard, another Red, another GI Joe. Then, just to tantalize us, there’s Looper, which looks like it’s got tons of potential:

Given the right role, Willis is able to bring both gravitas and humor to almost any film. When he’s fully invested, he possesses a natural charisma that most actors only dream of. He’s not the first actor to chase big paychecks and sacrifice talent and quality (looking at you, Nic Cage), and he won’t be the last. But that doesn’t make looking back on his mistakes any less sad.

Willis could have been Humphrey Bogart:

Instead, he’ll be remembered as Sly Stallone.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Film Has AIDS, The Dilemma

2 responses to “Bruce Willis Should Have Had a Better Career

  1. Salim

    Looper…then straight back to crap with Die Hard *enter rehash number here*

  2. Pingback: The Problems with Looper | Pop Culture Has AIDS

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s